Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules

Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules

还没有评分
Romance Philosophy
格式 Kindle
页数 375
语言 荷兰语,佛兰芒语
已发布 Jan 1, 2009
出版商 Springer
版本 2009
ISBN-10 9048126142
ISBN-13 9789048126149
想要阅读

评价这本书

导出书籍日志

描述

In "Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness," an insightful examination unfolds regarding the complex relationship between argumentation and rational discourse. The authors, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, and Bert Meuffels, delve into the subtleties of pragma-dialectical discussion rules, providing a rich theoretical framework supported by empirical research. Their work challenges readers to reconsider what constitutes sound reasoning and the common pitfalls that can undermine effective communication.

The book intricately explores various types of fallacies that individuals encounter in argumentative exchanges, offering a clear analysis of how these missteps affect the judgments made about reasonableness. By drawing on a wealth of empirical data, the authors present a compelling case for understanding argumentation not just as a formal practice, but as a dynamic interaction influenced by numerous factors, including context and participant engagement.

Throughout its pages, this work serves as both a scholarly resource for researchers and a practical guide for anyone interested in refining their argumentative skills. It invites readers to reflect on their own reasoning processes while highlighting the importance of maintaining clarity and integrity in dialogue. The authors' thorough investigation into fallacies and their implications fosters a deeper appreciation for the art of argumentative discourse.

评论

暂无评论

成为第一个评论这本书并分享您的想法的人

添加第一条评论

阅读记录

未找到阅读记录

开始跟踪你的阅读进度,然后在这里查看日志

添加您的第一条阅读记录

笔记

未找到笔记

开始添加笔记,然后在这里查看

添加您的第一条笔记

交易日志

未找到交易记录

开始跟踪你的书籍交易,然后在这里查看日志

添加您的第一条交易记录

相似书籍