Gladiator

No text exists with only one meaning. No story transmits just one feeling. Gladiator, for instance, could be seen as the story of a homicidal psychopath, who is, at the same time, a serial killer, and of masses (a serial killer of masses?). Or he is a soul looking for his destiny, once and again: in that case, there would be many souls doing the same. Or he is a gladiator and his violence is without boundaries. Or it is violence (the violence) which owns, without boundaries, a gladiator. Or it is the way that violence can build someone. Or it is the way that someone can build his violence.
In any case, and now without doubt, Gladiator can be seen as Gladiator. Which because is so true, it is obvious, and useless.