A Failed Parricide: Hegel and the Young Marx
まだ評価がありません
Romance
形式
ハードカバー
ページ数
282
言語
英語
公開されました
Dec 4, 2015
出版社
Brill Academic Pub
ISBN-10
9004269789
ISBN-13
9789004269781
説明
In this insightful exploration, the authors delve into the complex relationship between Hegel's philosophical ideas and Marx's revolutionary thought. They challenge conventional interpretations that solely view Marx as a straightforward successor to Hegel, instead proposing that Marx's break from Hegel represents a profound philosophical rupture. Through rigorous analysis, Finelli and Thomas uncover the nuances in Marx's critique, highlighting how Hegel's influence lingered even as Marx sought to redefine materialism.
The book's narrative unfolds the shifting landscape of ideas during a pivotal period of intellectual history. It examines how Hegel's dialectical method was both a foundation and a foil for Marx, enabling a deeper understanding of the socio-political implications of both thinkers. The dialogue between the two sets the stage for a larger discussion on the evolution of materialist philosophy.
By weaving together philosophical rigor and historical context, the authors invite readers to reconsider Marx's legacy and the philosophical tensions that shaped his theories. Their compelling argument positions this work as a critical examination of how revolutionary thought can be both influenced by and in opposition to its predecessors, shedding light on the ongoing relevance of these ideas in contemporary discourse.
The book's narrative unfolds the shifting landscape of ideas during a pivotal period of intellectual history. It examines how Hegel's dialectical method was both a foundation and a foil for Marx, enabling a deeper understanding of the socio-political implications of both thinkers. The dialogue between the two sets the stage for a larger discussion on the evolution of materialist philosophy.
By weaving together philosophical rigor and historical context, the authors invite readers to reconsider Marx's legacy and the philosophical tensions that shaped his theories. Their compelling argument positions this work as a critical examination of how revolutionary thought can be both influenced by and in opposition to its predecessors, shedding light on the ongoing relevance of these ideas in contemporary discourse.