Frontiers of Test Validity Theory: Measurement, Causation, and Meaning
아직 평점이 없습니다
Science & Technology
Business & Economics
Psychology
형식
페이퍼백
페이지
342
언어
영어
출판됨
Apr 9, 2013
출판사
Routledge
판
1
ISBN-10
1841692204
ISBN-13
9781841692203
설명
Exploring the landscape of test validity, this insightful work delves into the complex interrelationships between measurement, causation, and meaning. The authors, Keith A. Markus and Denny Borsboom, present a comprehensive framework that challenges traditional perspectives and encourages readers to rethink conventional approaches to validity. Their discussion highlights how deeper understanding can lead to better-designed assessments and interpretation of data.
As the narrative unfolds, Markus and Borsboom draw on a wealth of research and theoretical perspectives, offering fresh insights into the nuances of test validity. They underscore the importance of recognizing the multifaceted nature of constructs and the role that context plays in shaping measurement outcomes. This exploration not only broadens the reader's understanding but also lays the groundwork for future advancements in the field.
The book is a vital resource for researchers, educators, and practitioners striving for rigorous assessment practices. By addressing key questions and dilemmas within test validity, it encourages a critical examination of methodologies and fosters a more nuanced understanding of assessment processes in various settings.
As the narrative unfolds, Markus and Borsboom draw on a wealth of research and theoretical perspectives, offering fresh insights into the nuances of test validity. They underscore the importance of recognizing the multifaceted nature of constructs and the role that context plays in shaping measurement outcomes. This exploration not only broadens the reader's understanding but also lays the groundwork for future advancements in the field.
The book is a vital resource for researchers, educators, and practitioners striving for rigorous assessment practices. By addressing key questions and dilemmas within test validity, it encourages a critical examination of methodologies and fosters a more nuanced understanding of assessment processes in various settings.