Karty na stół

Karty na stół

아직 평점이 없습니다
Jan 1, 2005 · 폴란드어 · 페이퍼백 (236 페이지)
서가에 추가

이 책 평가하기


도서 일지 내보내기

책 세부 정보

형식 페이퍼백
페이지 236
언어 폴란드어
출판됨 Jan 1, 2005
출판사 Wydawnictwo Dolnośląskie
ISBN-10 8373843620
ISBN-13 9788373843622

설명

Pan Shaitana, cudzoziemiec z Orientu, ma egzotyczne hobby: sprasza na brydża morderców. Co gorsza, podczas spotkania pozwala sobie na słabo zawoalowane aluzje. Przynajmniej jeden z brydżystów słucha go uważnie, ponieważ gospodarzowi nie udaje się doczekać końca kolejnego robra... Wśród zaproszonych są jeszcze: pisarka poczytnych kryminałów Ariadna Oliver i niemniej słynny detektyw - Herkules Poirot.
'Czterech morderców i czterech detektywów: Scotland Yard, Secret Service, prywatny detektyw, literatka. Sprytny pomysł'. Trudno się nie zgodzić.

장르들

미스터리 공상 과학 액션 & 어드벤처 과학 & 기술 예술 및 사진 범죄 심리학

3/5 ★Started : 14.08.2025Finished : 16.08.2025Okay first of all, I've read it in French and finished it in only two days. From these informations, you can think " oh wow you really liked it ! Then why the low rate ? "Well because I didn't enjoyed it THAT much actually. I've read it in French and forced myself to finish it because my colleague from work landed me this and said that I would ABSOLUTELY love it (well meh—)Don't get me wrong, the writing was good and the plot great, I loved each characters a lot and the plot won't have been that predictable if I wasn't someone who overthink. The reason I rated this book a three stars is because FOR ME it was very much predictable. For me, I had three theories, it was either the doctor, or the young girl or he never actually died. Turns out I was right about the doctor !!I was waiting for a big plot twist because thats what my colleague told me when she recommended it to me.. well she was wrong. But again, I think it was predictable for me because I'm an overthinker (unfortunately for me..) its IMPOSSIBLE for me to NOT think at all. Even when I'm reading a book (especially if its a thriller or a fantasy) I will always try to think about what will happen next, what type of plot twist I will get and so on...So yeah because of that, its a 3 stars for me. But again, the plot is GREAT, the characters are all very enjoyable and it would have easily be a 5 stars if only it wasn't that predictable for me..

August 16th 2025

This one left me torn. I gave it 3 stars, though I debated giving it just 2. The premise was promising—four suspects, one of them a killer, and four sleuths to analyze it all. But it took me a while to get engaged, and the ending didn’t sit right with me.<spoiler>The last 100 pages built a case around Anne Meredith... only for the final 10 pages to say, “Surprise! It was Dr. Roberts all along!” Poirot explains it all (of course), and the doctor confesses, but it felt too convenient. Like a sudden deus ex machina with no real evidence to back it.</spoiler>That said, Poirot and Miss Oliver were the highlights—Poirot is always a treat. Their charm and sharpness kept me going. And that final line? I admit, it made me smile. Also, I found the side plot between Anne, Rhoda, and Major Despard way more interesting than the main mystery.Not my favorite Christie, but not a total loss either.

June 12th 2025

Es de los que más me han gustado? Pues no. No sé si por todo el rollo del bridge o por sus personajes. No obstante, me ha interesado mucho todo el tema del análisis psicológico que se les hace sólo por como juegan sus partidas. Resaltar que los giros inesperados del final, no me parecieron tan inesperados, más bien sentí que la autora sólo había intentado marear con quien podría ser la persona que cometió el asesinato

July 28th 2024
서가에 추가

이 책 평가하기


도서 일지 내보내기