海边的卡夫卡

I went into this book without knowing anything about it or about its author. I just read the first two chapters and became interested to read more. I am like 80 pages into it,and I know I can't read the rest. If I had researched a bit about, I probably wouldn't have started reading it in the first place. Because it is said that it is somehow similar to Cather in the Rye, the book I hate, but most people like. But the reason I quit reading it was't its similarity to Cather in the Rye. But it was the graphic sex scene, when the two involved were supposedly siblings. ugh. The rest is worse.I assure you. He is supposedly get involved with his mom, too. How can anyone like this book is beyond me. It's official now. It was the first and the last book I read ( or tried to read) by this author.

As my first foray into Murakami's world, "Kafka on the Shore" proved to be an intriguing, if occasionally perplexing, read. This 500-page novel is a character-driven narrative that weaves together two parallel storylines, creating a tapestry of the real and the fantastical.Murakami's writing style is undeniably unique - a blend of the weird, the imaginative, and the comforting. The author crafts a diverse cast of characters, each contributing significantly to the unfolding story. The dual narrative structure, following two distinct characters, adds depth to the tale, gradually revealing unexpected connections.However, as a newcomer to Murakami's work, I found the story challenging to follow at times. The book touches on some dark and taboo subjects, which might catch some readers off guard. There were also moments where the portrayal of women felt objectifying, though I'd need to read more of Murakami's work to determine if this is a pattern.Despite occasional lulls in the 500-page journey, the compelling narrative kept me engaged. The ending, while open to interpretation, left me craving more closure. This open-endedness, while thought-provoking, may not satisfy readers who prefer more concrete resolutions."Kafka on the Shore" is a book that likely rewards multiple readings, with layers of meaning to unpack. While I plan to revisit it in the future, I would caution against making this your first Murakami experience. It's a good and interesting read, but its complexity and unconventional structure might be better appreciated after familiarizing oneself with Murakami's style through his other works.In conclusion, "Kafka on the Shore" offers a unique, often bizarre literary journey. It's a book that will make you think, occasionally puzzle you, but ultimately leave an indelible impression. For readers willing to embrace the unconventional, it promises a rich, if sometimes challenging, experience.

"If the composition's imperfect, why would so many  pianists try to master it?""Good question." Oshima says, and pauses as music fills in the silence. "L have no great explanation for it, but one thing i can say. Works that have a certain imperfection to them have an appeal for that very reason - or at least they appeal to certain types of people. Just like you're attracted to Soseki's The Miner. There's something in it that drawstring you in, more than more fully realized novels like Kokoro or Sanshio. You discover something about that work that tugs at your heart - or maybe we should say that work discovers you. Schubert's Sonata in D Major is sort of the same thing."