Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules
Noch keine Bewertungen
Romance
Philosophy
Format
Kindle
Seiten
375
Sprache
Niederländisch, Flämisch
Veröffentlicht
Jan 1, 2009
Verlag
Springer
Ausgabe
2009
ISBN-10
9048126142
ISBN-13
9789048126149
Beschreibung
In "Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness," an insightful examination unfolds regarding the complex relationship between argumentation and rational discourse. The authors, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, and Bert Meuffels, delve into the subtleties of pragma-dialectical discussion rules, providing a rich theoretical framework supported by empirical research. Their work challenges readers to reconsider what constitutes sound reasoning and the common pitfalls that can undermine effective communication.
The book intricately explores various types of fallacies that individuals encounter in argumentative exchanges, offering a clear analysis of how these missteps affect the judgments made about reasonableness. By drawing on a wealth of empirical data, the authors present a compelling case for understanding argumentation not just as a formal practice, but as a dynamic interaction influenced by numerous factors, including context and participant engagement.
Throughout its pages, this work serves as both a scholarly resource for researchers and a practical guide for anyone interested in refining their argumentative skills. It invites readers to reflect on their own reasoning processes while highlighting the importance of maintaining clarity and integrity in dialogue. The authors' thorough investigation into fallacies and their implications fosters a deeper appreciation for the art of argumentative discourse.
The book intricately explores various types of fallacies that individuals encounter in argumentative exchanges, offering a clear analysis of how these missteps affect the judgments made about reasonableness. By drawing on a wealth of empirical data, the authors present a compelling case for understanding argumentation not just as a formal practice, but as a dynamic interaction influenced by numerous factors, including context and participant engagement.
Throughout its pages, this work serves as both a scholarly resource for researchers and a practical guide for anyone interested in refining their argumentative skills. It invites readers to reflect on their own reasoning processes while highlighting the importance of maintaining clarity and integrity in dialogue. The authors' thorough investigation into fallacies and their implications fosters a deeper appreciation for the art of argumentative discourse.
Rezensionen
Noch keine Rezensionen
Sei der Erste, der dieses Buch rezensiert und deine Gedanken teilt
Erste Rezension hinzufügenLesetagebuch
Keine Lesetagebücher gefunden
Beginne deinen Lese-Fortschritt zu verfolgen, um Log-Einträge hier zu sehen
Füge dein erstes Lesetagebuch hinzuNotizen
Transaktionsprotokoll
Keine Transaktionsprotokolle gefunden
Beginne, deine Buchtransaktionen zu verfolgen, um Log-Einträge hier zu sehen
Fügen Sie Ihr erstes Transaktionsprotokoll hinzu