Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules
No ratings yet
Romance
Philosophy
Format
Kindle
Pages
375
Language
Dutch, Flemish
Published
Jan 1, 2009
Publisher
Springer
Edition
2009
ISBN-10
9048126142
ISBN-13
9789048126149
Description
In "Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness," an insightful examination unfolds regarding the complex relationship between argumentation and rational discourse. The authors, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, and Bert Meuffels, delve into the subtleties of pragma-dialectical discussion rules, providing a rich theoretical framework supported by empirical research. Their work challenges readers to reconsider what constitutes sound reasoning and the common pitfalls that can undermine effective communication.
The book intricately explores various types of fallacies that individuals encounter in argumentative exchanges, offering a clear analysis of how these missteps affect the judgments made about reasonableness. By drawing on a wealth of empirical data, the authors present a compelling case for understanding argumentation not just as a formal practice, but as a dynamic interaction influenced by numerous factors, including context and participant engagement.
Throughout its pages, this work serves as both a scholarly resource for researchers and a practical guide for anyone interested in refining their argumentative skills. It invites readers to reflect on their own reasoning processes while highlighting the importance of maintaining clarity and integrity in dialogue. The authors' thorough investigation into fallacies and their implications fosters a deeper appreciation for the art of argumentative discourse.
The book intricately explores various types of fallacies that individuals encounter in argumentative exchanges, offering a clear analysis of how these missteps affect the judgments made about reasonableness. By drawing on a wealth of empirical data, the authors present a compelling case for understanding argumentation not just as a formal practice, but as a dynamic interaction influenced by numerous factors, including context and participant engagement.
Throughout its pages, this work serves as both a scholarly resource for researchers and a practical guide for anyone interested in refining their argumentative skills. It invites readers to reflect on their own reasoning processes while highlighting the importance of maintaining clarity and integrity in dialogue. The authors' thorough investigation into fallacies and their implications fosters a deeper appreciation for the art of argumentative discourse.
Reviews
Reading Log
No reading logs found
Start tracking your reading progress to see logs here
Add Your First Reading LogNotes
Transaction Log
No transaction logs found
Start tracking your book transactions to see logs here
Add Your First Transaction Log