Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules
هنوز رتبهبندی نشده است
Romance
Philosophy
فرمت
کیندل
صفحات
375
زبان
هلندی، فلمنگی
منتشر شده
Jan 1, 2009
ناشر
Springer
نسخه
2009
ISBN-10
9048126142
ISBN-13
9789048126149
توضیحات
In "Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness," an insightful examination unfolds regarding the complex relationship between argumentation and rational discourse. The authors, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, and Bert Meuffels, delve into the subtleties of pragma-dialectical discussion rules, providing a rich theoretical framework supported by empirical research. Their work challenges readers to reconsider what constitutes sound reasoning and the common pitfalls that can undermine effective communication.
The book intricately explores various types of fallacies that individuals encounter in argumentative exchanges, offering a clear analysis of how these missteps affect the judgments made about reasonableness. By drawing on a wealth of empirical data, the authors present a compelling case for understanding argumentation not just as a formal practice, but as a dynamic interaction influenced by numerous factors, including context and participant engagement.
Throughout its pages, this work serves as both a scholarly resource for researchers and a practical guide for anyone interested in refining their argumentative skills. It invites readers to reflect on their own reasoning processes while highlighting the importance of maintaining clarity and integrity in dialogue. The authors' thorough investigation into fallacies and their implications fosters a deeper appreciation for the art of argumentative discourse.
The book intricately explores various types of fallacies that individuals encounter in argumentative exchanges, offering a clear analysis of how these missteps affect the judgments made about reasonableness. By drawing on a wealth of empirical data, the authors present a compelling case for understanding argumentation not just as a formal practice, but as a dynamic interaction influenced by numerous factors, including context and participant engagement.
Throughout its pages, this work serves as both a scholarly resource for researchers and a practical guide for anyone interested in refining their argumentative skills. It invites readers to reflect on their own reasoning processes while highlighting the importance of maintaining clarity and integrity in dialogue. The authors' thorough investigation into fallacies and their implications fosters a deeper appreciation for the art of argumentative discourse.
نقدها
هنوز نظری ثبت نشده است
اولین نفری باشید که این کتاب را نقد کرده و نظرات خود را به اشتراک میگذارید
اولین نقد را اضافه کنیدسابقه خواندن
گزارشهای خواندنی یافت نشد
برای مشاهده گزارشها در اینجا، شروع به ردیابی پیشرفت خواندن خود کنید
اضافه کردن اولین سابقه خواندن شمایادداشتها
گزارش تراکنشها
هیچ گزارش تراکنشی یافت نشد
برای مشاهده گزارشها در اینجا، شروع به ردیابی معاملات کتاب خود کنید
اضافه کردن اولین سابقه تراکنش شما