Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness: Empirical Research Concerning the Pragma-Dialectical Discussion Rules
Pas encore d'évaluations
Romance
Philosophy
Format
Kindle
Pages
375
Langue
Néerlandais, Flamand
Publié
Jan 1, 2009
Éditeur
Springer
Édition
2009
ISBN-10
9048126142
ISBN-13
9789048126149
Description
In "Fallacies and Judgments of Reasonableness," an insightful examination unfolds regarding the complex relationship between argumentation and rational discourse. The authors, Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, and Bert Meuffels, delve into the subtleties of pragma-dialectical discussion rules, providing a rich theoretical framework supported by empirical research. Their work challenges readers to reconsider what constitutes sound reasoning and the common pitfalls that can undermine effective communication.
The book intricately explores various types of fallacies that individuals encounter in argumentative exchanges, offering a clear analysis of how these missteps affect the judgments made about reasonableness. By drawing on a wealth of empirical data, the authors present a compelling case for understanding argumentation not just as a formal practice, but as a dynamic interaction influenced by numerous factors, including context and participant engagement.
Throughout its pages, this work serves as both a scholarly resource for researchers and a practical guide for anyone interested in refining their argumentative skills. It invites readers to reflect on their own reasoning processes while highlighting the importance of maintaining clarity and integrity in dialogue. The authors' thorough investigation into fallacies and their implications fosters a deeper appreciation for the art of argumentative discourse.
The book intricately explores various types of fallacies that individuals encounter in argumentative exchanges, offering a clear analysis of how these missteps affect the judgments made about reasonableness. By drawing on a wealth of empirical data, the authors present a compelling case for understanding argumentation not just as a formal practice, but as a dynamic interaction influenced by numerous factors, including context and participant engagement.
Throughout its pages, this work serves as both a scholarly resource for researchers and a practical guide for anyone interested in refining their argumentative skills. It invites readers to reflect on their own reasoning processes while highlighting the importance of maintaining clarity and integrity in dialogue. The authors' thorough investigation into fallacies and their implications fosters a deeper appreciation for the art of argumentative discourse.
Avis
Aucun avis pour le moment
Soyez le premier à donner votre avis sur ce livre et partagez vos pensées
Ajouter le premier avisJournal de lecture
Aucun journal de lecture trouvé
Commencez à suivre vos progrès de lecture pour voir les journaux ici
Ajoutez votre premier journal de lectureNotes
Journal des transactions
Aucun journal de transactions trouvé
Commencez à suivre vos transactions de livres pour voir les journaux ici
Ajoutez votre premier journal de transactions
![[Ethical Principles and Economic Transformation - A Buddhist Approach (Issues in Business Ethics)] [Author: x] [May, 2011]](https://images.bookpine.com/bd815e9c-ead9-4e64-bfb5-aea659b2460b.jpg)
